North America Divided: The Mexican War, 1846-1848 | Hispanic American Historical Review (2024)

Skip Nav Destination

Book Review| August 01 1972

North America Divided: The Mexican War, 1846-1848

. By Connor, Seymour V. and Faulk, Odie B..

New York

,

1971

.

Oxford University Press

.

Map. Bibliographies. Index

. Pp.

viii

,

300

. Cloth. $7.95.

Steven T. Ross

Steven T. Ross

The University of Texas, Austin

Search for other works by this author on:

This Site

  • Standard View
  • Views Icon Views
    • Article contents
    • Figures & tables
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Supplementary Data
    • Peer Review
  • Open the PDF for in another window
  • Tools Icon Tools
    • Permissions

    • Cite Icon Cite

  • Search Site

Citation

Steven T. Ross; North America Divided: The Mexican War, 1846-1848. Hispanic American Historical Review 1 August 1972; 52 (3): 480–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-52.3.480

Download citation file:

  • Zotero
  • Reference Manager
  • EasyBib
  • Bookends
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • BibTex
toolbar search

Search Dropdown Menu

Advanced Search

North America Divided provides a good starting point for anyone wishing to study the Mexican War in depth. In a crisp, well-written narrative Professors Faulk and Connor describe the origins, course, and results of the conflict and pay due attention to the Mexican as well as the American side. Furthermore, the authors have provided an excellent analytical bibliography with over 750 entries covering all aspects of the war.

As with any short narrative there are bound to be problems. Faulk and Connor describe the military campaigns with admirable clarity but fail to explain how the relatively untried American forces consistently defeated veteran Mexican armies. Did the Americans have superior leaders, better tactics or more efficient weapons? The authors fail to clarify this intriguing point.

The authors also verge on the traditional American problem of trying to equate national self interest with universal morality. Although observers from Machiavelli to Morgenthau have noted that the interests of the state override other ethical and religious considerations, Americans cannot or will not accept this situation and feel a compulsion to react morally to even the most successful foreign policy venture. The results of this perpetual search for rectitude are often grotesque.

The Mexican War offers a fine example of this search for vindication. A successful affair by diplomatic and military standards, the War has been denounced as an evil conspiracy by some and blamed on the Mexicans or defined as the just action of a higher Anglo-Saxon civilization against an inferior Latin culture by others.

Faulk and Connor convincingly show that the Mexican government in the 1830s and ’40s was at best weak and divided. Moreover they demonstrate that Mexico was plagued by separatist movements not only in Texas but also in Yucatán, California, and what is now northern Mexico. They also show that Mexican intransigence (they regarded Texas annexation as a causus belli) as well as American belligerance helped bring about war in 1846.

This view, however, ignores the fundamental question of American goals. If the United States was determined to extend its power to the Pacific, and Polk’s designs on California indicate that this was indeed the case, a clash with Mexico was inevitable. The Mexicans had but two choices: a graceful surrender or a fight to retain their national frontiers. Mexican weakness in no way altered the fact that they reacted to a threat to their territorial integrity. Weakness influenced Mexico’s ability but not its right to contest American expansion. By 1846 both nations had non-negotiable demands, and only the belief that the Americans would have stopped short of the Pacific would permit the assertion that greater flexibility on one or both sides could have avoided war.

From the American point of view the results of the War were good, but this does not make them morally right. To claim moral justification or conversely guilt only obscures more important aspects of the War. Faulk and Connor might have profited from a more straightforward approach to the conflict, but despite this lapse, they have produced a readable informed narrative of one of America’s more successful ventures.

Copyright 1972 by Duke University Press

1972

data&figures Data & Figures contents Contents supplements Supplements references References related Related

Data & Figures

Contents

Volume 52, Issue 3

August 1, 1972

  • Previous Issue
  • Next Issue
  • Previous Article
  • Next Article

Advertisem*nt

Supplements

References

Related

248 Views

View Metrics

×

Citing articles via

Google Scholar

Email alerts

Advance Publication

Latest Issue

Close Modal

Related Articles

Doctors and Corporatist Politics: The Case of the Mexican Medical Profession

Arab “Amirka”: Exploring Arab Diasporas in Mexico and the United States

Comparability of the Black-White Divide in the American Speech Community and the Coloured-White Divide in the Afrikaans Speech Community

“How many Mexicans [is] a horse worth?” The League of United Latin American Citizens, Desegregation Cases, and Chicano Historiography

Related Topics

mexican

war

american

faulk

connor

mexico

america

Related Book Chapters

Reuniting the Divided

United and Divided

Man's Ruin Hearing Divide and Dissolve

Mapping Economies of Death From Mexican Independence to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo

North America Divided: The Mexican War, 1846-1848 | Hispanic American Historical Review (2024)

FAQs

North America Divided: The Mexican War, 1846-1848 | Hispanic American Historical Review? ›

North America Divided provides a good starting point for anyone wishing to study the Mexican War in depth. In a crisp, well-written narrative Professors Faulk and Connor describe the origins, course, and results of the conflict and pay due attention to the Mexican as well as the American side.

What was significant about the Mexican-American War 1846-1848 in American history? ›

It paved the way for so many other important events, from the expansion and dispossession of indigenous people, the California Gold Rush, and American Civil War. It added the states of California, Texas, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming to the United States.

How did the Mexican-American War divide the US? ›

How did the Mexican-American War increase sectionalism in the United States? The Mexican-American War reopened the slavery-extension issue, which divided the North and South and which had been largely dormant since the Missouri Compromise.

What is the historical context of the Mexican-American War? ›

One of the causes of this war were the continued claims to Texas from both the United States and Mexican governments. Other reasons were claims against the Mexican government by American citizens for damages during the continuous Mexican Revolutions of the period and the U.S. desire to claim California.

What were the points of controversy between the US and Mexico in 1845 1846? ›

On May 12, 1846, the United States Senate voted 40 to 2 to go to war with Mexico. President James K. Polk had accused Mexican troops of having attacked Americans on U.S. soil, north of the Rio Grande. But Mexico claimed this land as its own territory and accused the American military of having invaded.

Why didn't the US conquer Mexico? ›

There were significant political divisions in Mexico which seriously impeded the war effort. Inside Mexico, the conservative centralistas and liberal federalists vied for power, and at times these two factions inside Mexico's military fought each other rather than the invading U.S. Army.

Why did Mexico lose the Mexican-American War? ›

Many of Mexico's troops were outfitted with weapons that were nearly 30 years old. The country was forced to purchase old guns and ammunition in bulk from France, which had been used during the Napoleonic Wars of the early 19th century.

What were the three main causes of the Mexican-American War? ›

The Mexican-American War of 1846-1848 was a combination of Mexican unwillingness to recognize Texas independence, the desire of Texans for statehood, and American desire for westward expansion.

What was the conclusion of the Mexican-American War? ›

The Mexican-American War was formally concluded by the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. The United States received the disputed Texan territory, as well as New Mexico territory and California. The Mexican government was paid $15 million — the same sum issued to France for the Louisiana Territory.

Why was the Mexican-American War controversial? ›

Opponents denounced the war as an immoral land grab by an expansionist power against a weak neighbor that had been independent barely two decades. The war's critics claimed that Polk had deliberately provoked Mexico by ordering American troops into disputed territory.

What is the historical importance of the Mexican War of Independence? ›

Known as the “Grito de Dolores,” Hidalgo's declaration launched a decade-long struggle that ended 300 years of colonial rule, established an independent Mexico and helped cultivate a unique Mexican identity. Its anniversary is now celebrated as the country's birthday.

How did the Mexican-American War affect American politics? ›

How did the Mexican-American War affect American politics? It divided the nation based on the issue of slavery in the territories. Who supported the Wilmot Proviso? Northerners who wanted to reserve new land for white settlers.

How did the Mexican-American War end? ›

The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, that brought an official end to the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), was signed on February 2, 1848, at Guadalupe Hidalgo, a city north of the capital where the Mexican government had fled with the advance of U.S. forces.

What were the reasons the Mexican-American War was unjustified? ›

Three main reasons America was unjustified in going into war with Mexico were that President James k. Polk provoked it, America's robbery of Mexico's land and the expansion of slavery.

Which was a major argument in favor of the Mexican War in 1846? ›

The major argument in favor of the Mexican War in 1846: Option D is the correct answer because the Mexican government was enraged by the United States' annexation of Texas. The Mexican government never accepted or recognized Texas as an independent state, believing that the US had no authority to take or annex Texas.

How did the Mexican-American War 1846 1848 influence the US Civil war? ›

On the surface, the war's outcome seemed like a bonanza for the United States. But the acquisition of so much territory with the issue of slavery unresolved lit the fuse that eventually set off the Civil War in 1861.

What was a significant result of the Mexican-American War of 1846 to 1848? ›

Final answer: The significant result of the Mexican-American War was that the United States experienced increased tension over the issue of slavery as the nation had to decide whether the new territories obtained would be free or slave-holding.

What was the most significant effect of the Mexican-American War? ›

The United States received more than 500,000 square miles (1,300,000 square kilometers) of land (now Arizona, California, western Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah) from Mexico.

What important US history event happened in 1846? ›

September 21–24: Battle of Monterrey (Mexican–American War).
  • June 14 – Mexican–American War: The California Republic declares independence from Mexico.
  • June 15 – Bear Flag Revolt: American settlers in Sonoma, California start a rebellion against Mexico and proclaim the California Republic.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 6612

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Birthday: 1996-12-09

Address: Apt. 141 1406 Mitch Summit, New Teganshire, UT 82655-0699

Phone: +2296092334654

Job: Technology Architect

Hobby: Snowboarding, Scouting, Foreign language learning, Dowsing, Baton twirling, Sculpting, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Francesca Jacobs Ret, I am a innocent, super, beautiful, charming, lucky, gentle, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.